Posted at October 20, 2009 @ 6:48 pm by Lt_Scrounge in Assaults on freedom, Global warming fallacy, Historical perspective, Info about politics, Knowledge is power., Unconstitutional acts, economic insights, government waste and fraud, international affairs
In yesterday’s installment, I posted comments by two of the top government proponents of man made global warming legislation. Legislation that will cripple the US economy, costing tens of millions of jobs, widespread poverty and homelessness with absolutely NO impact on the environment.
Here are some more of the esteemed leaders of the environmental movement telling you what they really feel about the every day person.
“Global Sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control.” -Professor Maurice King
Two Sources:
http://www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu -_Depopulation__the_Opiate_of_the_Intelligentsia_, http://autarchic.tripod.com/files/quotations2.html
Wanna Bet Professor King doesn’t want to give up his 6 figure income, big house, ability to go to any restaurant, etc etc etc? I didn’t think so. Remember, they didn’t stay in school for 8+ years to live in poverty, they did it to tell you to. I also bet the professor doesn’t want to be on the list of people declared too old to adequately benefit from a medical procedure because he’s exceeded his government planned life span either.
“The only way to get our society to truly change is to frighten people with the possibility of a catastrophe.” – emeritus professor Daniel Botkin
Two Sources: http://www.peopleforwesternheritage.com/PFWHRMAdditionalQuotes.htm, http://www.informationliberation.com/
And exactly what type of change does this professor think the world needs? More Marxism caused poverty? I REALLY think they need to force professors to work REAL jobs, with Profit and Loss responsibility, or at least do away with tenure so these idiots can be gotten rid of. As Ben Franklin put it, “The pity of common sense is that it is so uncommon.”
“We need to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest.” – Stephen Schneider, Stanford Professor of Climatology, lead author of many IPCC reports
Two Sources: http://climatesight.wordpress.com/2009/04/12/the-schneider-quote/, http://www.green-agenda.com/gaia.html
The truth doesn’t matter as long as it sounds good. I’m sure Communism sounded good to the Russian peasants in 1917 and Nazism did to the German people in 1934. Neither were based in truth, but sounded good. We all know how that turned out. Anyone need some more koolaid?
“It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true.” - Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace
Two Sources: http://www.the-thinking-man.com/environmentalism.html, http://www.prisonplanet.com/cnns-climate-change-dishonesty.html
Again, another global warming, environmentalist talking about how truth doesn’t matter. I guess they missed the Sunday School lesson about not bearing false witness.
The next couple of comments are two esteemed authorities wanting the government to have the ability to determine who gets to have children. Chilling that these people are not only taken seriously, but have access to actual political power.
“Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.” - David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club
Two Sources: http://www.activistcash.com/biography_quotes.cfm/bid/3507, http://www.aim.org/wls/category/control/
Do I have to explain the sheer outrageousness of that comment to anyone? This man thinks government should be GOD, and people take this guy seriously.
“Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun.” - Prof Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University
Two Sources: http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/climate-change/climate-change-overview/2/, http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Future-of-Energy-by-George-Washington-090308-140.html
And this guy is a professor at an esteemed college? This is also the author of “The Population Bomb” and colleague of Barack Obama’s science advisor John Holdren who advocated mandatory abortions.
And exactly WHY should these people be taken seriously? Wanna bet how well the idea of forced sterilization would go over in the housing projects or the welfare offices? Let’s see how fast the Democrats back away from that one when their constituency in “the hood”, find out about it. The ACLU was fighting mad when a private organization paid drug addicts to have tubal ligations and vasectomies. Of course, that was a conservative organization trying to cut down on unwanted pregnancies, versus a liberal government agency trying to cut down on carbon emissions. The ACLU would probably find that acceptable.
November 5, 2009 @ 4:14 am
+ We should be more concerned about Global Warming and Climate Change because Typhoons are getting much stronger and there are greater incidence of Flooding. take for example the recent Typhoon Ketsana which devastated some countries in South East Asia.
November 6, 2009 @ 12:03 am
Research the Little Climatic Optimum and the Climatic Optimum and try to figure out why all of the horror stories that you’re being told (BY PEOPLE WHO BY THEIR OWN ADMISSION ARE LIARS) haven’t happened before? Because they aren’t going to happen. Thirty years ago, the same people who are screaming “Global Warming” were screaming “Coming Ice Age”. By their own admission, it doesn’t have anything to do with being honest, it’s about forcing people to accept radical decreases in their lifestyle while they make off with millions.
Population control is the ultimate goal | survivingscrounge.com said:
December 12, 2009 @ 12:48 am
[...] insights, government waste and fraud, international affairs netklix.comAs I reported here in October, the true agenda of the environmentalists has nothing to do with actually protecting the [...]